Visiting addressNiels Henrik Abels hus Moltke Moes vei 35 (map)
Sabrina Pauli is giving a conference talk at the conference First Joint Meeting Brazil-France in Mathematics at IMPA in Rio de Janeiro.
In joint work with Elden Elmanto and Paul Arne Oestvaer we extend etale descent results of Thomason, Levine and Elmanto-Levine-Spitzweck-Oestvaer. Specifically, over quite general base schemes, we construct self-maps of motivic Moore spectra whose telescopes satisfy etale hyperdescent. We also show that etale localization is smashing in our context, and consequently recover all the aforementioned etale descent results. In this talk I will give an overview of the proof of these results: I will explain our methods for constructing the self-maps, our use of the six functors formalism to reduce to the case of fields, and our use of the slice spectral sequence to reduce to Levine's etale descent theorem.
Jonas Irgens Kylling is giving a seminar talk at the Oberseminar Algebraische Geometrie at the University of Zürich.
Sabrina Pauli is giving a conference talk at the conference Affine Algebraic Geometry and Transformation Groups in honor of Lucy Moser-Jauslin's 60th Birthday in Dijon.
Subtle Stiefel-Whitney classes have been introduced by Smirnov and Vishik as a tool for classifying quadratic forms. Following this path, in this talk, I will introduce subtle characteristic classes for Hermitian forms, coming from the motivic cohomology ring of the Nisnevich classifying space of the unitary group associated to the standard split Hermitian form of a quadratic extension. Moreover, I will discuss the connection between these new classes and the subtle Stiefel-Whitney ones, deduce information on the kernel invariant for quadratic forms divisible by a 1-fold Pfister form, show that these classes see the triviality of Hermitian forms and express the motive of the torsor associated to a Hermitian form in terms of its subtle characteristic classes.
Unlike most cohomology theories in algebraic geometry, algebraic K-theory does not satisfy descent with respect to arbitrary blow-up squares. We explain why the only obstruction is the failure of the Mayer-Vietoris property for unions of closed subschemes. Since this obstruction vanishes after forcing A1-homotopy invariance, this gives a direct new proof of Cisinski's theorem that homotopy K-theory does satisfy cdh descent.
I will talk about how to prove an arithmetic refinement of the Yau-Zaslow formula by replacing the classical Euler characteristic in Beauville's argument by a variant of Levine's motivic Euler characteristic. We derive several similar formulas for other related invariants, including Saito's determinant of cohomology, and a generalisation of a formula of Kharlamov and Rasdeaconu on counting real rational curves on real K3 surfaces. Joint work with Frank Neumann.
There are several cohomology theories over a field like Hodge cohomology theory that are not A1-invariant but still having other fundamental properties like the Projective bundle formula. These are not representable in DM. I will explain how to extend DM to include them using log geometry and cube-invariance. Some fundamental properties like Gysin triangles and blow-up triangles will be also discussed. This is joint with Federico Binda and Paul Arne Østvær.
In preparation for the MHE seminar "log motives over a field", we give an introduction to ongoing work on motives for log schemes over fields. This is joint with Doosung Park and Paul Arne Østvær.
Sabrina Pauli is giving a conference talk at the women in homotopy theory and algebraic geometry workshop in Berlin.
I will discuss the “isotropic motivic category”. This “local” version of Voevodsky motivic category (with finite coefficients), obtained from the “global” one by, roughly speaking, annihilating the motives of anisotropic varieties, has many remarkable properties. Considering such “local” versions for all finitely generated extensions of a ground field, permits to read global information in a rather simple form. For appropriate (so-called, “flexible”) fields, “isotropic motives” are more reminiscent of their topological counterparts. In particular, “isotropic Chow groups” hypothetically coincide with Chow groups modulo numerical equivalence (with finite coefficients) and so should be finite-dimensional (checked in various cases). On the other hand, the “isotropic motivic cohomology” ring of a point doesn’t depend on a field and encodes Milnor’s operations.
This talk discusses a few properties of cones with respect to a single endomorphism of the unit in the motivic stable homotopy category.