Explaining patterns in modern ruminant diversity: contingency or constraint?

Bovid species outnumber those of cervids by over two and half to one. The present study attempts to explain this difference using two principle concepts: contingency and constraint. The concept of contingency considers the role of biogeography and the distributions and timings of major dispersals seen in the two families. Although this historical context is considered vital for understanding the problem, cervids are also characterized by their global absence from open and arid grassland habitats. This is explained in terms of phylogenetic constraint. One proposal considers the deciduous antlers of cervids as constraining the group to higher quality forage that is not generally associated with open habitats. Alternatively and more generally applicable to all ruminants is the ‘cusp fusion hypothesis’, presented here for the first time. The hypothesis seeks to explain how the primitive ruminant molar state, as seen in modern cervids and giraffids, prevents the attainment of very high molar crowns and, with it, the ability to cope with high rates of dietary tooth wear. Conversely, the derived condition of precocial cusp fusion seen in the Bovidae and Antilocapridae has enabled higher tooth crowns, their expansion into open habitats, and an increased diversity potential.