Show summary
Stage boundaries are determined by integrating bio-, magneto-, and chrono-stratigraphic units. Numerical ages of stage boundaries ideally should be constrained or verified by reliable radiometric ages of sedimentary strata – a challenging task in the absence of ash layers suitable for U-Pb zircon dating. For example, the numerical age of the Jurassic – Cretaceous (J/K) boundary is still uncertain. Recent efforts provided some ammonite biostratigraphy across the J/K boundary in the Slottsmøya Member of the Agardhfjellet Formation on Spitsbergen. However, the age and duration of the uppermost Jurassic (Volgiann stage) and the lowermost Cretaceous (Ryazanian stage) in the Boreal realm remain loosely defined. Our study adds new radiometric ages for this controversial stage boundary and presents geochemical data to evaluate paleoenvironmental settings. Three black shale intervals from two drill cores (DH2 and DH5) located ~7 km apart in Central Spitsbergen provide three Re-Os ages. In DH2, shales from the Slottsmøya Member previously provided conflicting biostratigraphic results (Volgian toRyazanian)[1]. An isochron derived from samples at 497m depth yields an imprecise 146.8 ± 6.8 Ma age, suggesting deposition in the Upper Volgian rather th precludes confirmation. Large uncertainties near the J/K
boundary are typical for this region[2, 3]. Two Re-Os isochron ages from the Oppdalen Member (DH2 at 724 and DH5 at 658 m) yield similar ages of 157.6 ± 3.3 Ma and 157.9 ± 2.9 Ma, respectively. These ages are close to the GTS Oxfordian – Kimmeridgian stage boundary and, even within their uncertainties, suggest Oxfordian – Kimmeridgian deposition. The agreement between these correlative intervals in the two cores[4] lends credence to the accuracy of the Re-Os age.
Biostratigraphic data, however, suggest a somewhat older age. Seafloor erosion, reworking and redeposition, could create this discrepancy between geochronologic and biostratigraphic age determinations. Given that biostratigraphy between the Boreal and Tethyan realms is poorly correlated, the radiometric ages provided by this study could be a stepping stone toward better
connecting the Boreal with the Tethyan realm. But
further work, on all fronts, is needed.
Acknowledgements. Thanks to the UNIS CO2 LAB for access to the drill cores. HS acknowledges the supportof ACS-PRF award # 59965-ND2.
References:
[1] Koevoets, M.J., Hammer, Ø. & Little, C.T.S. (2019). Norwegian Journal of Geology 99, 1-24.
[2] Georgiev, S.V., Stein, H.J., Hannah, J.L., Xu, G.,Bingen, B., & Weiss, H.M. (2017).
EPSL, 461, 151-162.
[3] Markey, R., Stein, H.J., Hannah, J.L., Georgiev,.V., Pedersen, J.H., & Dons, C.E.(2017). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 466, 209-220.
[4] Koevoets, M.J., Abay, T.B., Hammer, Ø., & Olaussen, S. (2016). Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 449, 266-274