Sea ice, temperature and predation influence respectively the survival of young and old polar cod in the Arctic Barents Sea

In the Arctic part of the Barents Sea, climate change is increasing temperature, melting the sea ice and bringing more predators. All these are a concern for the polar cod (Boreogadus saida) a key species in this food web. In a recent paper published in Marine Ecology Progress Series (Dupont et al. 2021) we explore which of these environmental factors has the most effect on polar cods.

In the northern Barents Sea, environmental changes in the form of increased bottom temperature, decrease sea ice cover, changes in zooplankton population and increase in abundance of large piscivorous fishes such as Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) is a concern for the survival of endemic Arctic fish species such as polar cod (Boreogadus saida) (Fossheim et al. 2015, Frainer et al. 2017, Stige et al. 2019). Polar cod is a key Arctic forage fish in the Arctic food web, and reduction of the stock as a response to a warmer climate may alter the transfer of energy to Arctic top predators such as sea birds, seals or polar bear. However, knowledge on the environment relationships with the population dynamics of Arctic marine species is still lacking in order to assess the effect of global change on Arctic species. In a recent study published in Marine Ecology Progress Series (Dupont et al. 2021), we were therefore interested in which environmental factors i.e. sea-ice, sea temperature, prey condition or predation condition are the most likely to influence the population dynamic of the polar cod stock in the Barents Sea?

To answer this question, we developed a Bayesian state-space model of population dynamics of polar cod based on 30 years of survey data, in order to quantify the effects of abiotic factors (sea-ice and sea temperature), prey biomass indexes and predation index on the abundance of age groups 0 to 4. We also quantified the strength of density dependent effect between consecutive age groups. In a second exercise, we used the estimated environmental covariate effects on the survival of polar cod to compare the predicted stock of polar cod using observed environmental values i.e. “null scenario” against hindcast prediction in different environmental scenarios reflecting the current environmental changes observed in the Barents Sea: 1) a cold scenario with high sea-ice and low temperature, 2) a warm scenario with low ice and high temperature, 3) low predation scenario and 4) a high predation scenario.

Figure 2: Environmental effects on polar cod abundance

Our result showed strong density-dependent effects between the spawning stock biomass and age-0 as well as between age 0 and age 1 (Figure 2). In addition, our results showed a positive effect of sea ice on the survival of age groups 0 and 1 as well as a positive effect of sea temperature on age 1. Predation index had a negative effect on age groups 3 and 4 only. Prey biomass did not show any strong effect on any age groups. Using hindcast scenarios to upscale age groups level to population level, our results show an increase (+87% in average) in predicted total stock biomass in a cold scenario and a decrease (-34% in average) in a warm scenario. Although the total stock biomass difference between the warm and cold scenario is important, it is not as strong as the effect of sea ice and temperature on specific age groups e.g. age 1. The scenario with decreased predation showed an increase (+78% in average) in total stock biomass and a decrease (-28% in average) in the scenario with increased predation. As for sea-ice and temperature scenarios the effect of predation on the total stock biomass were less strong than compared to its effect on the age groups 3 and 4 specific biomasses.

Sea-ice may affect survival of young age group by reducing the refuge area against predators in the case of age 1 as well as reducing the availability of spawning grounds for age 0 as previously suggested in the Barents Sea (Huserbråten et al. 2019). Bottom temperature only positively affected age group 1 and suggested a positive effect of temperature on survival that could be explain by a higher metabolism and better swimming speed (Laurel et al. 2016, Koenker et al. 2018) to escape predators or/and a better availability of potential preys coming from boreal areas of the Barents Sea (Loeng & Gjøsæter 1990). Predation effect on older age groups was expected as harp seal and cod are considered the main predator species on polar cod in the Barents Sea (Ajiad et al. 2011). The effect was only strong on older age groups; however predation on younger age group may be exerted by other predators that were not included in this study.

Our results show a weaker effect of environmental factors at the population level than age group specific level. This difference in effect between the two levels suggest the existence of dampening of environmental effects between age group that may be linked to the existence of density dependent effects between age groups and/or between SSB and age group 0.

Nevertheless, the effect of predation at the population level were weaker than effect of sea ice and temperature. Our study suggest that the stock of polar cod is resilient to current changes in predator community compared to the ongoing warming of the Barents Sea.

References:

Dupont N, Durant JM, Gjøsæter H, Langangen Ø, Stige LC (2021) Effects of sea ice cover, temperature and predation on the stock dynamics of the key Arctic fish species polar cod Boreogadus saida. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 677:141-159. doi:10.3354/meps13878

Ajiad A, Oganin IA, Gjøsæter H (2011) Polar cod. In: Jakobsen T, Ozhigin VK (eds) The Barents Sea ecosystem, resources, management Half a century of Russian-Norwegian cooperation. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim

Fossheim M, Primicerio R, Johannesen E, Ingvaldsen RB, Aschan MM, Dolgov AV (2015) Recent warming leads to a rapid borealization of fish communities in the Arctic. Nature Climate Change 5. doi:10.1038/nclimate2647

Frainer A, Primicerio R, Kortsch S, Aune M, Dolgov AV, Fossheim M, Aschan MM (2017) Climate-driven changes in functional biogeography of Arctic marine fish communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:12202-12207. doi:10.1073/pnas.1706080114

Huserbråten M, Eriksen E, Gjøsæter H, Vikebø F (2019) Polar cod in jeopardy under the retreating Arctic sea ice. Communications Biology 2. doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0649-2

Koenker BL, Copeman LA, Laurel BJ (2018) Impacts of temperature and food availability on the condition of larval Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) and walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus). ICES J Mar Sci 75:2370-2385. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsy052

Laurel BJ, Spencer M, Iseri P, Copeman LA (2016) Temperature-dependent growth and behavior of juvenile Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) and co-occuring North Pacific gadids. Polar Biology 39:1127-1135. doi:10.1007/s00300-015-1761-5

Loeng H, Gjøsæter H (1990) Growth of 0-group fish in relation to temperature condtions in the Barents Sea during the period 1965-1989. ICES CM 1990 G:49:9 pp.

Stige LC, Eriksen E, Dalpadado P, Ono K (2019) Direct and indirect effects of sea ice cover on major zooplankton groups and planktivorous fishes in the Barents Sea. ICES J Mar Sci:i24-i36. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz063

Tags: Polar cod, Arctic marine ecosystems, Barents Sea By Nicolas Durpont, Joël Durant
Published Nov. 25, 2021 10:56 AM - Last modified Nov. 25, 2021 10:56 AM
Add comment

Log in to comment

Not UiO or Feide account?
Create a WebID account to comment