FUI's course evaluation

INF4580 - Semantic technologies

Assessment:

Choose a question to see data from the student assessment:

Question: What is your general impression of the course?

Average answer: Somewhat good

Question: What do you think of the course's difficulty level?

Average answer: Appropriate

Question: What do you think of the amount of work required in relation to a number of credits given?

Average answer: Appropriate

Question: What is your general impression of the quality of the lectures?

Average answer: Somewhat good

Summary:

The respondents in general found this course to be Somewhat good. The rating of the difficulty levels was divided between Difficult to Easy, with a pretty even split between them. The respondents said that the work load was Appropriate. The respondents were divided in the rating of the quality of the lectures, ranging from Somewhat bad to Exceptionally good. The respondents rated the difficulty level, number and amount of work involved in the mandatory assignments as Appropriate. The difficulty level of the final exam is rated as Appropriate.

The students commented that the automatic validation of the first mandatory assignments were helpful, and that the assignments were relevant. Some respondents said they wanted more real life examples in the course.

Quotes:

I liked the lectures with good explanations. It was great to have automatic validation on the first few assignments in order to easily build confidence and competence on the syntax. […]
Relevant assignments, some lectures held by people working on related technologies, good combination of theoretical and practical content
I thought the quality of lectures was inconsistent, from some where I was barely able to grasp what the lecture was about, to others that were simply amazing.
I would prefer the lectures to be more practical oriented and showing real life examples Overall I was very pleased with the lectures. [Lecturer] were incredibly good at teaching. I found all the slides very helpful and great for later review and studying. I was not as impressed by the guest lecture, but I suppose that people that do not work as teachers cannot be expected to have an equally high standard. Lectures about SPARQL queries was harder to follow due to language and number of examples

About the course evaluation

The course evaluation is done by students in FUI (Fagutvalget ved Institutt for informatikk), and is based on questionnaires made at the end of each semester.