FUI's course evaluation
IN5600 - Programming Ubiquitous Things
Assessment:
Choose a question to see data from the student assessment:Question: What is your general impression of the course?
Average answer: Somewhat good
Question: What is your general impression of the quality of the lectures?
Average answer: Somewhat good
Summary:
The respondents' general impression of this course was Quite good. The course's difficulty level and the amount of work required in relation to the number of credits given were both evaluated as Appropriate. The quality of the lectures was rated a Appropriate. The course's project was rated as Important for the students learning and understanding of the curriculum, and the difficulty level was Appropriate. The level of the final exam was rated from High to Appropriate.
The respondents pointed out an interesting curriculum and a relevant project as positive aspects of the course. However, the respondents also felt that the evaluation criteria for the project and oral exam were unclear, and did not correspond with the project specification. The respondents also wished that the lectures had been recorded.
Quotes:
Informative, new and modern. Knowledgable professor.
The project was a little too big for what impact it had on the grade.
Way too many sample oral exam questions. Would be easier to give a few broader questions.
About the course evaluation
The course evaluation is done by students in FUI (Fagutvalget ved Institutt for informatikk), and is based on questionnaires made at the end of each semester.