The bi-weekly ODD seminar series at CCSE
The Open Discussions on Didactics (ODD) is a seminar series on Mondays at 13-14 every other week (odd week numbers).
Upcoming
Marthe Arntzen is a PhD candidate at The Norwegian Centre for Science Education.
Previous
Ellen Egeland Flø holds a PhD in STEM Education, and has recently started working at The Norwegian Centre for Science Education.
Henning V. Myhrehagen er PhD-kandidat ved CCSE og KURT.
Esmeralda Campos is a guest researcher from University of Vienna. She will kick off the Fall 2026 ODD seminar series by giving a talk about her and her colleagues' work in Physics Education Research at the Austrian Educational Competence Centre (AECC) .
Nicoline Berit Campbell Birkeland er PhD-student ved Senter for tverrfaglig utdanning (INTED).
Ane K. Espeseth is a PhD Candidate at INTED and will give a talk about her work.
Helene Lane is a PhD Candidate at CCSE and will present her work on using text embeddings of research papers to study trends in Physics Education Research.
Over the last 3 years, generative AI has rapidly entered science and physics classrooms, teacher education, and educational research. But what does the empirical literature on AI in science education actually show?
The use of Machine Learning (ML) models in research is not a novel concept, especially in quantitative spaces. Yet, many questions arise from qualitative researchers in connection with the trustworthiness of the results due to the "black box" nature of the models and the overall decision-making process. Of the different types of qualitative data, text is most associated with the application of ML methods, specifically from the domain of Natural Language Processing (NLP).
An expert committee led by Anders Malthe-Sørenssen was set down by the Norwegian government to analyze how AI is impacting higher education. The committee will deliver its final report in november 2026. The committee will address how learning outcomes should be adjusted to account for the AI, how teaching and learning will be impacted by AI and how assessment must be adjusted in an age of AI. In this talk, I address the preliminary report from the expert committee with particular focus on recommendations on assessment practices.
Since AI chatbots were first released, new ways of using large language models have been developed, like AI agents and integrated coding tools. AI chatbots themselves have also changed enormously, and new models are constantly being released to the public as private companies compete to offer the very best models.
Students use AI. This can be beneficial, but it also creates challenges in the classroom. Careless use of AI can make students expose their sensitive data, bypass their own learning and harm their teachers' trust. Teachers see these risks, but lack the time explore AI tools themselves and develop effective pedagogy.
In the modern day, we are surrounded by unimaginably vast amounts of literature. As the number of publications continues to increase, as does the demand for analyzing this data in a systematic and transparent way.
Generative AI is here to stay. For physics educators, the question isn’t whether to use it, but rather how. In this talk I will reflect on the opportunities and challenges of integrating AI into physics education.
In this Odd seminar, we will look at how thematic analysis was described in the much cited 2006 paper by Braun and Clarke, how these authors have later developed and described it, and critique against (uncritical) use of thematic analysis. Finally, we will discuss the use of thematic analysis and which alternatives exist.
Computation is so central to physics knowledge production, it is difficult to imagine contemporary physics without computers for simulation, theory-building, experimental design, data collection, processing, machine learning and more. Despite its centrality, computation has historically only been weakly integrated into physic education. Moreover, where it has, computation has been constructed rather narrowly through the lens ofd numerical methods and simulation. A question arises: How do we create learning environments that incorporate computation in a way that corresponds to disciplinary practice?
Quantum technology (QT) is a rapidly emerging trend in society and industry. This reinforces the need for an educated workforce that can navigate these changes. As a result, we are seeing the emergence of dedicated specializations and study programmes in quantum science and technology (QS&QT) worldwide.
Research on the construction and development of teaching identity has recently sparked a growing interest in science education due to its influence on the development of teaching strategies and its direct impact on student learning. Particularly in Secondary Education, pre-service teachers (PSTs) face a duality between their identity as students and their identity as science teachers, which gives rise to difficulties during teacher education programs. These difficulties are mostly related to the change in professional identity, the teaching model they aspire to, and their previous professional experience.
Mathematics and physics are two disciplines separated by a common language. Since the 1990s, we have been developing curricular materials that attempt to bridge this gap, as part of the Paradigms in Physics and Vector Calculus Bridge projects, leading also to the development of an online textbook.
Most of our work focuses on the transition from multivariable calculus to upper-division physics courses such as electromagnetism.
In this ODD seminar, Henning Myhrehagen will present findings from his interview study to open a wider discussion on the integration of programming in science education.
Conjecturing and generalizing are two central practices in mathematics, and mathematical thinking and activity often involve examining patterns across cases to articulate conjectures or generalizations.
Lauren Barth-Cohen will hold a seminar about students sense making about conceptual and procedural inconsistencies in an introduction physics lab.
Tor Ole Odden will hold a seminar about how Artificial Intelligence and human cognition are related.
Andreas Haraldsrud is going to talk about how we can use computers to widen our understanding of proteins. Note: this seminar will be held in Norwegian.
Computational literacy provides a metaphor and framework for how learners’ understanding, practice, and social relationships in computing can be organized.
In science disciplines that use computing, computational literacy posits cognitive, material, and social pillars of knowledge, practice, and belief. In a new national computing education project, we are working to define these pillars and their related knowledge, practices, and beliefs across undergraduate physics.
As we have started that work, we've found the need to examine physics computational literacy (PCL) more critically. Here, we discuss issues related to the context in which a student’s PCL might develop and the relationship between that development and external forces (in the US, power and privilege), as well as pedagogical considerations.